My series "Vet on the loose" is back on air on Animal Planet in the UK at the moment, but my real crusade, for something I really believe in, is to try and explain to more vets the clear benifits that keyhole surgery can have for their patients. I find it so frustrating, and .... I find it really dissapointing that vets are failing to embrace techniques that are clearly so benificial for their animal patients. I have started the internet portal www.veterinarylaparoscopy.com on all aspects of keyhole surgery in animals, for both pet owners, the zoo community, and veterinary surgeons, and have several specialist contributors from all arond the world.
Laparoscopy is the gold standard in numerous human surgical procedures, such as cholecystectomy. The benifits such as less pain, faster recovery, decreased post-op infections, decreased risks of wound opening and complications, and shorter hospitalisation are all well recognised. Why, in contrast, is the veterinary profession so slow in taking up laparoscopic techniques, when the benifits appear so apparent? It can not soley be cost - numerous practies offer much more expensive MRI, yet don't offer laparoscopic surgery!
Perhaps it is due to alternatives, rather than cost. Arthroscopy (minimally invasive joint surgery) is better established in veterinary surgery, and has been routinely performed in specialist practices, as there is little alternative. In contrast, one can always simply just crank the abdomen open widely - it is quick and easy for the vet, and of course in many cases requires much less skill, even though it is far from ideal in many cases for the animal patient. I suspect that veterinary laparoscopy will only really become mainstream once animal owners increasingly insist on it, and by voting with their feet, practices that fail to offer it realise that they are loosing clients and business unless they adapt.